RSS

Category Archives: Uncategorized

Sardines, a hidden delicacy

When most people think of sardines, they think of the canned variety. Devoid of much taste except a pungent fishy one, they aren’t too delightful. But what about fresh sardines? Because it is such a lowly fish, most Americans give little thought to this fabulous treat. But throw a little sea salt on a few fresh sardines, maybe a spice rub, throw them on the grill, and you have a wonderful, flavorful dinner. In Portugal, grilled sardines are eaten as street snacks and are quite popular.

Why eat sardines? Other than the fact that they are quite delicious when served just off the grill, they are very healthy for you. Sardines provide an excellent source of:

  • Vitamin D (to protect your bones)
  • Omega-3 Fats (to protect your heart)
  • Vitamin B-12 (for your brain and nervous system)
  • Selenium (to prevent cell damage)
  • Co-Enzyme Q10 (thought to be helpful in fighting heart disease)

In addition, because sardines are tiny little fish, they are low on the food chain. They have lower levels of mercury and other fat-soluble poisons than other big fish like tuna.

Now, for the tricky part. Where to find them? Most Whole Foods stores will actually get them for you if ask for them on special request. Not too long ago, a customer at the Petaluma Whole Foods asked for several pounds and the boyfriend and I were lucky enough to be able to score some extras. Just ask the fishmonger. You can also try asking your local supermarket or checking the Asian supermarkets near you.
For more inspiration, check out this post on sardines galore on Chowhound.com!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 9, 2010 in Uncategorized

 

Tags:

Why a tax on sodas would reduce obesity

Tell a cigarette smoker that smoking causes you lung cancer and he’ll probably blow smoke in your face. Add several dollars of taxes to his cigarettes and he might put down the cigarette.
Why?
People very quickly respond to money — particularly when it is being taken out of their wallet.
Nobody likes taxes. It’s true, and it is unclear as to whether people would vehemently reject a tax on soda. But we now have clear evidence that making it more expensive would decrease the consumption of the sugar-laden drinks.
According to a large study by researchers at the University of North Carolina (from the LA Times):
“with every 10 percent increase in the price of a two-liter bottle, people consumed 7 percent fewer calories from soda. They also took in fewer calories over all.”
What was even more impressive was that:
“When people faced an even larger increase — $1 for a two-liter bottle of soda, comparable to a proposed tax in Philadelphia — they consumed 124 fewer calories a day, the study found. The lower soda intake was associated with a drop in weight of more than two pounds — and a lower risk for pre-diabetes.”
The study looked at over 12,000 young adults for 20 years and studied food consumption patterns.

The lesson learned here? A tax would most certainly work. There have been other suggestions that making healthy food cheaper would work just as well, which is something I certainly agree with (for instance, water bottles could be the cheapest thing on the menu), but would it be enough?

There is no question that sodas, particularly those with high-fructose corn syrup, are bad for your health. So let’s get taxin’!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 16, 2010 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , ,

Does Labeling Wines as “Eco-Friendly” Hurt Wineries?

Consumers generally flock to “organic” and “eco-friendly” products, but when it comes to wines, “eco-friendly” and “organic” wines fare worse than wines that do not put these types of green labels on the bottle.

A study published in the journal Business and Society found that wines priced over $25 with an eco-friendly label commanded lower prices than similarly rated wines without “green” labels. Check out this US News & World Report story by Meg Sullivan for complete details about the study.

Why would this be?

Consumers are still wary about “organic” wines because for a long time, wines that were labeled as “green,” “eco-friendly” or “organic” were thought to be produced by hippies who didn’t focus on quality. The majority of consumers who are purchasing wines over $25 are still more conservative folks who are primarily interested in one thing when purchasing a bottle that is expensive: quality. They may be wary of a product that is “eco-friendly” because they may think that quality may have fallen by the wayside.

Excellent producers who have always been organic, such as Sanford Wines, keep their organic practices mum. I applaud them for helping out the environment without greenwashing, but I do wish that more consumers would reward environmentally friendly wineries.

One interesting place where this is also the case is in bottle selection. In general, more expensive bottles of wine tend to have thicker glass and be heavier, giving the consumer the impression that they are worth more. But heavier bottles also require more fuel to ship, and are therefore less eco-friendly.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 9, 2010 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , ,

Another reason to make your own food

Salmonella in packaged foods like dips, chips, salad dressings, sauces and more. From the Vancouver Sun:

OTTAWA — Canadian consumers can likely expect an avalanche of food recalls after an ingredient used in thousands of processed foods was found to be contaminated with salmonella, government investigators said Friday.

The popular flavour enhancer hydrolyzed vegetable protein (HVP) is added to a wide range of processed foods, including dips, salad dressings, chips, sauces, hotdogs, soups and frozen dinners. Already, 56 products in the United States and two in Canada — chips and veggie dips — have been recalled this week after salmonella was detected in the flavouring ingredient produced by a Nevada company.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency on Friday said the recall net will probably widen as it continues to work with the Canadian clients of Basic Food Flavors, Inc. and importers of processed foods containing the ingredient.


 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 8, 2010 in Uncategorized

 

Great Consumer Direct Tips for Wineries

For some excellent consumer direct tips, head to the Free Run blog over at Juice Box | Direct, a company that specializes in direct-to-consumer sales in the wine industry headed by Kristi Taaffe. Some examples?

1. Update your customers’ contact and credit card data with a simple phone call.

2. Get to know your club members and surprise them on birthdays or anniversaries.

3. When calling your customers, conduct a simple survey to get feedback on your wine club program or tasting room.

Check out her blog for more great tips!

 
1 Comment

Posted by on March 3, 2010 in Uncategorized

 

Sonoma County – Should it be on your wine label?

Sonoma County wineries are currently buzzing with whether they would eventually be required to put “Sonoma County” on the label, much like Napa and Paso Robles require wineries to put those counties on the label in addition to the AVA.

According to the Sonoma County Vintners, the organization that is interested in pursuing the legislation, adding “Sonoma County” would help retailers AND consumers recognize the wines from the region and would help sell wines from more obscure regions like Green Valley and Chalk Hill — AVAs that your average beginner wine drinker doesn’t really know about.

People from Sonoma Valley and Sonoma Coast think it would be redundant — after all, they say, do consumers really need to see Sonoma Coast AND Sonoma County on the same bottle of wine? We’ve had lots of discussions here in the Petaluma Gap and some vintners think it is silly to have the double “Sonoma” label.

But as any marketer (and psychologist) knows, the more people see something, the more they like it, so seeing Sonoma over and over again isn’t a bad thing.

Steve Heimoff over on his blog thinks that people should just make good wine — that is doesn’t matter what it says on the label — but sadly, I disagree. I wish people would just buy wine because they know a lot about what they are buying, but the truth is that people buy brands they recognize. And Sonoma, like it or not, is a brand that really needs to be sold.

Everyone has heard of Napa, but fewer people worldwide have heard of Sonoma. So if there are millions upon millions more bottles of wine that have the word “Sonoma” on them, how can that possibly be a bad thing?

What do you think?

 
1 Comment

Posted by on February 19, 2010 in Uncategorized

 

Great Wines Under $25

I am often asked by friends and family as to which are my “favorite” wines. The answer is that it depends on what I’m in the mood for and what I’m going to drink. And it also depends on the occasion. I’m not going to open up a $60 bottle of wine for a weekday meal night. But here are my personal favorites for under $25. Please add your favorites in the comment section!

Michelle’s Great Wines Under $25.00

General Tips:
Since it is not always easy to find a particular wine at a store, here are my recommendations for browsing…

  • Wines from Argentina, New Zealand, Chile, Spain are great buys right now
  • Cheap California and French wines tend to be questionable. In general, CA/French wines under $10.00 should be avoided.
  • Look for little-known varietals for good buys: Cabernet Franc, Viognier, Torrontes, Petite Sirah, Vouvray, Carmenere
  • Hot California regions right now: Mendocino, Paso Robles, Lodi, Monterey (St. Rita Hills), Santa Cruz, Santa Barbara
  • Stainless-steel (or “unoaked”) Chardonnays pair well with a variety of foods and are easy to drink

White Wines

How to read:
1. Varietal
2. Producer
3. Region/Country
4. Descriptors
5. Price

Sancerre
Chavignol, Domaine Vincent Delaporte
Sancerre, France
Crisp, tangy lemon, grapefruit, granite, excellent white wine.
$20.00

Torrontes
Crios de Susana Balbo
Salta, Argentina
Intensely floral, lavendre, mandarin, honeysuckle, long finish
$14.00

Sauvignon Blanc
Picton Bay
Malborough, New Zealand (South Island)
Tropical flavors, pineapple, pear, twist of lime, fresh and zesty
$10.00 at Trader Joe’s

Roussane, Marsanne, Viognier
Anglim Cameo
Paso Robles, USA
Spicy finish, lower acid, minerality, aromatic, floral
$16.00

*****************
Red Wines

Cabernet Franc
M. Cosentino Cab Franc
Napa Valley
Rich, chocolate, lush, ripe
$13.00

Red blend
La Loggia Barbera D’Alba
La Loggia
Barbera D’Alba, Italy
Beautiful acidity, blood orange, tart, juicy, pomegranite
$6.00 at Trader Joe’s

Malbec
Catena Zapata ** Excellent all-around producer
Mendoza, Argentina
Dark stone fruits, lush, chocolate, cherry
$20.00

Petite Sirah
Bogle Vineyards ** Excellent all-around producer
Lodi and Clarksburg, USA (East of SF Bay)
Leather, nice full body, dark prune, plum, tobacco, orange rind
$9.00

Petite Syrah, Zinfandel, Mourverde blend
Phantom, Bogle Vineyards
Lodi, Clarksburg, Amador, USA
Dark, earthy, leather, blackberry, plum
$17.00

Malbec
Ben Marco
Mendoza, Argentina
Leather, dark plum, blackberry, blueberry, smooth, low acidity
$20.00

Pinot Noir
Chalone Vineyard ** Excellent all-around producer
Monterey County, USA
Fresh raspberries, orange rind, cranberry juice, light tannins, red stone fruits
$16.00

Zinfandel
Edmeades
Mendocino County, USA
Rich, almost sweet, relatively light body, tannins nearly absent, easy to drink on its own
$20.00

Pinot Noir
Morton Estate White Label Hawkes Bay
New Zealand
Well-balanced Pinot Noir with sweet cherry, licorice, earthy, mushroom, long finish.
$16.00

Tempranillo
Fuerza Winery/Laurel Glen Vineyard
Mendoza, Argentina
Chocolate, coffee, cassis, nutty, hazelnut
$5.00 at Trader Joe’s

Negrette
Santa Barbara Winery
Santa Barbara, CA
Fragrant berry aroma, dark blackberry, coffee
$24.00

Red wine blend (Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Montepulciano)
Trentatre, produced by Santini Wines
Montepulciano, Italy
Lush, rich, ripe, rich plum
$6.00 at Trader Joe’s

Carmenere
Casillero del Diablo (Concha y Toro)
Rapel Valley, Chile
Complex, fruity, long finish
$9.00 at Trader Joe’s

 
2 Comments

Posted by on September 6, 2009 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,